"pip bip - choose Corrour" (hhgttg69)
01/01/2017 at 04:24 • Filed to: Chevrolet, Chevy, Chev, Monte Carlo, 1976, 1977 | 1 | 8 |
either a 1976 or 1977 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
jimz
> pip bip - choose Corrour
01/01/2017 at 04:41 | 1 |
stacked rectangular headlamps looked good on nothing.
pip bip - choose Corrour
> jimz
01/01/2017 at 04:45 | 1 |
except for 77/78 Dodge Monaco / Plymouth Fury
Wagon Guy drives a Boostang
> pip bip - choose Corrour
01/01/2017 at 05:01 | 0 |
Looks like it’s in good shape.
KnowsAboutCars
> jimz
01/01/2017 at 05:25 | 0 |
I don’t mind the ‘76 mid-size Buicks.
pip bip - choose Corrour
> Wagon Guy drives a Boostang
01/01/2017 at 05:27 | 0 |
can’t get close enough to see properly, but at first glance it certainly does.
Eric @ opposite-lock.com
> pip bip - choose Corrour
01/01/2017 at 10:22 | 1 |
This gave me a pang of feeling old. I remember these from my childhood. Someone on my street DD’d one and it looked a lot nicer than this even though it was probably 8-12 years old at the time.
They’re hideously-ill-proportioned cars with classic malaise quality. I considered them old when I was a kid (not that I had much experience with even contemporary cars, aside from a Hyundai Excel, considering I grew up in a ghetto and the newest car my parents had during my childhood (a 1970 VW T2 Transporter) was 18 years old when they acquired it), now it boggles my mind that they’re desirable...
Birddog
> jimz
01/01/2017 at 16:47 | 0 |
Amen!
Birddog
> pip bip - choose Corrour
01/01/2017 at 16:50 | 1 |
1977. 1976 had the Monte Carlo emblem in the grille, 77 made it a hood ornament.